NAPA Net - Polling Places 111921

Does the 4% Rule Matter?

A new report claims that the so-called 4% rule of retirement spending needs adjustment – the media all seems atwitter (literally).  But does it (really) matter?

The 59-page report by some research folks at Morningstar opined that those wanting a high level of assurance that their retirement nest egg will last should spend no more than 3.3% of their savings in the first year of a three-decade retirement, and adjust for inflation after that.  And as you might expect – considering not only that the report calls into question a long-standing “rule” of retirement planning – and particularly that it does so in the context of reducing expectations for retirement spending – it garnered a lot of headlines, including the Wall Street Journal (and even this publication).
1.Are you familiar with the so-called 4% rule?
2.Do you use the 4% rule in your communications/financial planning education with participants/clients?
3.Has the recent surge in inflation found its way into your communications/discussions about retirement planning?
4.Does the so-called 4% "rule" matter in your practice(s)?
5.What is your role working with retirement plans?
6.What size plans do you PRIMARILY work with?
7.Suggestions for future survey questions?  What would YOU like to ask other NAPA-Net readers?
8.Want (me) to say "hi"?  leave your email!
Privacy & Cookie Notice