NAPA Net - Polling Places 113018

Is it Time for a Broad Acceptance of 3(16) Fiduciary Services?

A recent survey of retirement plan advisors to determine what their attitudes are toward 3(16) fiduciary outsourcing. In the resulting report, “Advisors and 3(16) Fiduciary Outsourcing,” the firm found that more and more advisors are looking at transferring administrative fiduciary responsibility to 3(16) fiduciaries.

According to the results, more than 80% of surveyed advisors are familiar with 3(16) outsourcing. In addition, another 84% of respondents said they are considering recommending 3(16) administrative services.


1.Do you/your firm currently offer 3(16) fiduciary services?
2.Whether or not you offer those services, are you seeing more of those offerings now than a year ago?
3.Do you think that plan sponsors see the difference between 3(16) fiduciary services and traditional fiduciary support?
4.If you/your firm offers 3(16) fiduciary services, are your plan sponsor clients/prospects receptive to them?
5.If your plan sponsor clients/prospects aren't receptive to 3(16) services, why not (check all that apply)?
6.Other comments about fiduciary services, 3(16) fiduciary services, misunderstandings about 3(16) services, enthusiasm for 3(16) services, lack of enthusiasm for 3(16) services, or life in general?
7.What is your role working with retirement plans?
8.What size plans do you PRIMARILY work with?
9.Suggestions for future survey questions?
10.All responses are anonymous and confidential, of course - but if you'd like me to know who you are, or allow for a response, you can leave your email below...
Privacy & Cookie Notice