Weighing in on ESG

The Labor Department has the industry all abuzz about ESG (environmental, societal, governance) investments – this week we’d like to know if they’ve made inroads with your practice.

Late last month, noting its concern “that the growing emphasis on ESG investing may be prompting ERISA plan fiduciaries to make investment decisions for purposes distinct from providing benefits to participants and beneficiaries and defraying reasonable expenses of administering the plan,” the Labor Department proposed a new rule to clarify the standards.  Standards, it seems fair to say, that left unamended might be expected to slow interest.

Workable, consistent definitions of ESG remain fluid, and perhaps as a result, the adoption rate among defined contribution plans has been tepid—and the take-up rate among participants even lower. Fewer than 3% of plans offer an ESG option, according to the 62nd annual Plan Sponsor Council of America survey, and less than 0.2% of plan assets have been invested in those options. 

In the wake of what is sure to be a bit of controversy, this week we’d like to know about your experience with ESG offerings

Question Title

* 1. What's YOUR take on the Labor Department's recent proposed rule with regard to ESG options on the DC plan menu (please only pick one)?

Question Title

* 2. What's YOUR take on the suitability of ESG options on a defined contribution/401(k) plan menu (please only pick one)?

Question Title

* 3. Are you actively recommending ESG options to your plan sponsor clients/prospects?

Question Title

* 4. Are your plan sponsor clients/prospects proactively asking about ESG options?

Question Title

* 5. Are your plan sponsor clients/prospects acting on implementing ESG options?

Question Title

* 6. When the plan(s) you work with add an ESG option, what has, generally speaking, been the participant response?

Question Title

* 7. The proposed rule singled out ESG as a QDIA, noting that it “does not believe that investment funds whose objectives include non-pecuniary goals—even if selected by fiduciaries only on the basis of objective risk-return criteria consistent with paragraph (c)(3)—should be the default investment option in an ERISA plan.”  What do you think of that?

Question Title

* 8. OK, last question; how're you doing (check all that apply today)?

Question Title

* 9. Other comments about ESG, your feelings about ESG, plan sponsor perspectives on ESG, the impact of the Labor Department's FABs on ESG adoption, the impact of the Labor Department's proposed rule on ESG adoption, the enthusiasm (or lack thereof) among participants for the option, the amount of action versus interest in the alternative, or life in general?

Question Title

* 10. What is your role working with retirement plans?

Question Title

* 11. What size plans do you PRIMARILY work with?

Question Title

* 12. Suggestions for future survey questions?  Seriously - what would you like to know about/from your fellow NAPA-Net readers?  Or what would you like to be asked?

Question Title

* 13. All responses are confidential, of course - but just in case you would like a response - or want me to know you responded - or just want to say hi - here's your chance to do so (don't forget your email)!

T