2022 EPI Canada Conference
Evaluation - November 18, 2022
1.
Name (optional):
2.
Please indicate which profession you belong to:
Psychiatrist
GP/FP
Nurse
Social Worker
Pharmacist
OT
Case Manager
Other (please specify)
3.
Please indicate how well this program met the stated learning objectives.
After participating in this session, participants will be better able to;
Exceeded
Met
Poorly Met
Did Not Meet
Recognize the signs and symptoms of psychosis in the early phase of illness;
Exceeded
Met
Poorly Met
Did Not Meet
Develop strategies to minimize relapse risk for patients with psychotic illness;
Exceeded
Met
Poorly Met
Did Not Meet
Support comprehensive treatment plans focused on functional recovery and safe transitions of care;
Exceeded
Met
Poorly Met
Did Not Meet
Consider regional differences in the standardization of early intervention services across Canada.
Exceeded
Met
Poorly Met
Did Not Meet
4.
Please rate how well the content achieved appropriate balance in addressing your learning needs:
Excellent
Good
Somewhat Good
Average
Somewhat Fair
Fair
Poor
Excellent
Good
Somewhat Good
Average
Somewhat Fair
Fair
Poor
5.
Was the information presented clinically relevant?
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
6.
Please choose the statement which most applies to you.
The information I learned today will change the way in which I practice
The information I learned today will have me consider changes I can implement in my practice
The information I learned today will NOT change the way I practice
7.
Was the program free of commercial or other forms of bias?
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
8.
Which information would you like to see covered in future CCEIP learning programs?
9.
KEYNOTE PRESENTATION
Dr Ashok Malla: Functional Recovery
Please rate the speaker on the following:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Credibility
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Engagement level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Practicality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial or other forms of bias
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The content was consistent with stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
10.
CONCURRENT SESSION #1
Please select the session you attended:
Dr Clairélaine Ouellet-Plamondon: Comorbidity of Substance Use
Dr Srividya Iyer & Ms Laurie Roeszler: Family Centered Practice
Dr Howard Margolese: Pharmacotherapy
11.
Please rate the selected speaker(s) on the following:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Credibility
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Engagement level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Practicality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial or other forms of bias
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The content was consistent with stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
12.
CONCURRENT SESSION #2
Please select the session you attended:
Sudhakar Sivapalan: Comorbidity of Trauma and Personality Disorder
Ashok Malla: Assessing Relapse Risk
Phil Tibbo & Nicole Kozloff: Transitions of Care
13.
Please rate the selected speaker(s) on the following:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Credibility
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Engagement level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Practicality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial or other forms of bias
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The content was consistent with stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
14.
PLENARY: PRESENTATION
Dr Amal Abdel-Baki: EPI Services in Canada
Please rate the speaker on the following:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Credibility
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Engagement level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Practicality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial or other forms of bias
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The content was consistent with stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
15.
PLENARY: PANEL DISCUSSION
Ms Brittany Chisholm, Dr George Foussias, Dr Diane Fredrikson, Dr Srividya Iyer: Regional Successes and Challenges
Please rate the speakers on the following:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Credibility
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Engagement level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Practicality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge level
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Free of commercial or other forms of bias
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The content was consistent with stated objectives
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
16.
General comments:
