The usage of the Standard Carbon Intensity (SCI) specification (Beta) and its relevance for being incorporated into GHG Protocol Guidance.

1.Are you using the SCI today for your own sustainability tracking and/or reporting?
2.If not, are there any specific blockers that are keeping you from using the SCI standard? For example, accuracy, completeness, consistency, relevancy, transparency.
3.Are you reporting against any other standards for identifying emissions associated with software usage?
4.Are there other frameworks and standards for understanding carbon emissions you would find it useful for the SCI to be compatible with for reporting?
5.Do you consent to having your anonymized responses shared beyond this internal survey; specifically, to be submitted as part of the WRI proposal submission?
Privacy & Cookie Notice