NCSC 2012-13: Communication Part 2 (Tier 2)

NCSC 2012-13: Communication Part 2 (Tier 2)

 
As mentioned at the NCSC Community of Practice Webinar - Communication (Part 2) you just completed, your feedback is necessary (1) to help the project improve its services and materials to you and (2) to inform federal reporting required of the NCSC GSEG. This survey should not take more than 5 minutes to complete.

All responses are confidential and will only be seen by the NCSC GSEG external evaluators at the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE). If you have any questions or problems with the survey, please contact Dr. Brent Garrett at PIRE (bgarrett@pire.org or 502-619-3763).

We appreciate your assistance in making sure the best possible professional development is provided to you and your colleagues in your state and nationally.
1. Please answer each question below.
YesNo
Did you view the webinar?
Did you complete the study guide?
Did you participate in the live chat discussion or listen to the archived chat?
2. Based on your participation in the NCSC Community of Practice webinar, please select the option below that best indicates your response to each statement.
Strongly DisagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly AgreeNot Applicable
I was able to access the webinar/presentation easily.
I was satisfied with the overall quality of the PowerPoint/webinar.
I understand my role and responsibilities as a member of the NCSC CoP (Community of Practice).
I found the Study Guide to be a useful tool in understanding the materials discussed in the webinar.
The conversation during the Discussion Group was relevant to the Instructional Triangle and our work in preparing for the development of a model AA-AAS.
The process clearly conveyed the meeting information (i.e., use of facilitators, presentations, videos, small group work, etc.).
3. Based on your participation in the NCSC Community of Practice webinar, please select the option below that best indicates your response to each statement.
Strongly DisagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly AgreeNot Applicable
Language used in the webinar is clear.
Language used in the webinar was concise, but with enough detail to help my understanding of this concept.
The layout of each slide makes the material easy to follow.
The font and style don’t get in the way of my understanding.
The graphics, pictures, or videos add to the understanding instead of distracting.
If there is a voice over, the voice doesn’t distract or irritate me so much that I can’t hear the words being said.
4. Based on your participation in the NCSC Community of Practice webinar, please select the option below that best indicates your response to each statement.
Strongly DisagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly AgreeNot Applicable
As a result of this webinar and associated activities, I can identify components of successful communication.
As a result of this webinar and associated activities, I can identify intervention steps for improving communication competence.
As a result of this webinar and associated activities, I can identify strategies for improving communication competence.
As a result of this webinar and associated activities, I can determine intervention steps used by teams.
As a result of this webinar and associated activities, I can determine strategies used by teams.
5. As part of the NCSC GSEG evaluation efforts, we need to assess the quality, relevance, and utility of project activities, as they apply to the development of a model alternate assessment based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS). The questions below relate to those three evaluation pieces.

Please select the response that best describes your perceptions of the Community of Practice webinar.
UnacceptableLowAcceptableSuperior
Did the content of the webinar accurately reflect current federal policy and/or the best of current research and theory on AA-AAS?
Was the webinar designed so that progress was made in achieving the stated goals of the webinar?
Did the work that occurred during the webinar help you to better conceptualize the development of a model AA-AAS?
Did the content of the webinar address the opportunities and challenges of your state in conceptualizing the development of a model AA-AAS?
Did the content of the webinar address the challenges and barriers of including all applicable students in your states’ AA-AAS?
Is it likely that that the information discussed and gathered in this webinar will positively impact the development of a model AA-AAS?
Is it likely that the information discussed and gathered in this webinar can have an impact outside the development of a model AA-AAS?
6. What additional materials and/or supports would help promote your knowledge development as part of this Community of Practice?